The eu-ai-act scorecard maps your runs onto specific obligations of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689: Article 55 (obligations for general-purpose AI models with systemic risk, including adversarial testing) and Article 73 (serious-incident reporting). This is finer-grained than the compliance scorecard, which shows EU AI Act risk tiers. Here each obligation is a row, and the scorecard says which of your runs speak to it.

Running it

Reading the table

Each obligation carries its own status and counts: Runs that errored are counted separately and never reported as bypasses. Five provider timeouts against a systemic-risk category show up as five errored runs, not five systemic-risk bypasses. A control that could not run is not a finding.
The obligation identifiers (55(1)(a) through 73(6)) are real provisions of the regulation, but the mapping from ai-blackteam findings to obligations is this project’s interpretation, marked unverified in the data. It is a starting point for an audit conversation, not a legal compliance certificate.